Bank of America’s getting help to hurt homeowners in high places
What's the worse than Bank of America acting as if it deserves immunity from all its bad foreclosure behavior? A presidential administration that agrees.
President Obama's administration is putting pressure on New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman to give into a deal with big banks that would block him from bringing future mortgage investigations, Grethchen Morgenson reports in The New York Times today.
For months, Schneiderman has said he will not agree to any nationwide agreement with banks that would block individual states from investigating the mortgage-servicing industry on their own. At one point Bank of America was said to be in talks to with state and federal officials without the involvement of Schneiderman. But now the pressure is on Schneiderman to join the agreement, say 'okay' and move on.
Schneiderman's position on the matter was of course not sitting well with banks that would rather shell out a huge sum of money (reportedly $20 billion) than deal with ongoing suits. Bank of America,JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo are among the banks being investigated for foreclosing on struggling homeowners without proper paperwork and procedure.
When the nation's 50 state attorneys general joined forces in the fall to look into the matter the probe seemed to have some teeth. The AGs were appalled at some of the alleged behavior by banks with Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal saying at the time. “At the best, banks engaged in careless negligence, at worst, outright fraud.”
Now though, an investigation that once felt like it might end in prosecution for some in the mortgage service industry is turning into a joke. There are only a handful of AGs still looking to thoroughly investigate exactly what banks did wrong and how they should be punished. AG Schneiderman is the leader among that group, and as I pointed out last week is a big thorn in struggling Bank of America's side.
Unfortunately there aren't enough thorns willing to look into what was once believed by the AGs to be "outright fraud." Instead, officials are working with banks to work out a deal, and anyone who isn't on board risks being viewed as someone who is stalling a housing recovery. The most recent example of this is cited in Morgenson's story where she reports that "Shaun Donovan, the secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and high-level Justice Department officials have been waging an intensifying campaign to try to persuade" Schneiderman to a deal that would give banks a free pass over future foreclosure claims.
The problem, as The Big Picture's Barry Ritholtz points out this morning, is that the federal regime's interest is so closely tied to the banking industry that bad news for banks is inherently bad news for the administration. From Ritholtz:
Note that the Federal Reserve (and indirectly, the NY Fed) are conflicted players in this. On the one hand, they are supposed to be bank regulators (a task they have performed poorly). But they are also substantial investors in the banks, and their regulatory oversight role is obviously conflicted.
There have been all manner of criminal and civil trespasses committed, and we should find out who ordered them, who committed them and why. AG Schneiderman should continue investigating the robo-signing, bring civil and criminal charges where necessary.
Recall that the original problems came about in large part due to Alan Greenspan’s Nonfeasance — the failure to perform his professional obligations of oversight and regulation. That any member of the Federal Reserve or NY Fed wants this closed before any investigation has been undertaken is a scandal of the highest magnitude.
Federal foreclosure initiative involves renting foreclosed homes
A federal initiative to have investors buy and rent out thousands of government-owned homes to prevent foreclosures is drawing cautious optimism locally.
The intent is to help stabilize falling home prices, particularly in neighborhoods hit by foreclosures. Local real estate observers generally think the government should make it easier for investors to buy, refurbish and lease out foreclosed homes.
Mike Swanson, vice president of Roseville-based Rottlund Homes, likes the idea of the government taking a more active role in stabilizing home prices.
"They need to do something to help us," Swanson said.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency said earlier this week that it is seeking input on how to avoid foreclosures by selling large quantities of homes – to be turned into rentals – currently owned by government-controlled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration.
The government owned roughly 248,000 foreclosed homes at the end of last month, officials said. About 70,000 of those are listed for sale. But officials expect the number of foreclosures to soar in the coming months.
The U.S. government rescued Fannie and Freddie in September 2008 and has funded them since the financial crisis. The mortgage giants own or guarantee about half the nation's mortgages and nearly all new mortgages.
Federal officials are accepting ideas through Sept. 15 for how to sell government-owned homes slated for foreclosure. The end of the supply of rental housing.
The government wants large-scale transactions rather than individual sales. The plan might involve management by a third party, a joint venture or some other structure to respond to local economic and real estate conditions.
"It's probably a good idea because these homes sitting around empty aren't helping values in the communities where they are," said Herb Tousley, director of the University of St. Thomas real estate programs.
Foreclosures still make up a sizable share of the for-sale market in the Twin Cities metro, putting downward pressure on prices. Foreclosures accounted for 1,141 sales in July versus 2,418 traditional sales, according to the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors.
Jennifer Snyder, president of the St. Paul Area Association of Realtors, said she would like to see government ease the long and bureaucratic process of buying foreclosed homes.
"They just need to make it easier," she said.
Pat Paulson, an agent active with the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors, also would favor officials helping ease the process for investors to buy and turn around foreclosures for rentals.
"The market's doing it right now, but it's a long, slow process and it is holding prices down," he said.
Gita Sitaramiah can be reached at 651-228-5472.
Buying Maine Short Sales: Understanding the Short Sale Addendum will make or break your deal!
One aspect to the Real Estate transaction is Contract Negotiation. When a homebuyer and seller agree to a purchase price and general terms, this is laid out in writing and a Binding Contract is born. This contract was stone, and although we Realtors are not attorneys, our knowledge on drafting contracts and intrepting the language differentiates the good from the bad agents.
Fast forward to Today! Millions of active homes on the market are now Short Sales. The most attractive pricing are Short Sales and REOs. MOST AGENTS DO NOT KNOW how to structure and interpret a Short Sale Addendum.
An addendum to a contract allows for parties involved to add certain elements to a real estate deal without having to re-write the entire contract over again. Usually its a deadline extension, or a price change, etc…its not a big deal in simple terms to understand how to draft an addendum.
The Short Sale Universe has its own set of rules. THE SHORT SALE ADDENDUM is more powerful and important than the contract itself!!!
For example, in the great State of Maine, our short sale addendum has TWO major caveats, where most Buyer and Seller agents overlook and ingnore. Typically, agents just submit the entire Zip Form generated Short Sale addendum with the mindset that it’s a necessesary part of a short sale, because the Purchase Price is decided and approved by the Seller’s Bank. Right and WRONG!
There is language that allows a Buyer to back out at any time prior to receiving Short Sale consent or approval from the lien holder. When this is left intact and not redacted and negotiated out, it leaves a Short Sale seller vulnerable to the buyer getting antsy for waiting around.
HOW IS THIS THEN, A BINDING CONTRACT? There’s nothing binding about it.
Secondly, and conversely, the last paragraph entitles the Seller to continue to market the property for OTHER offers, typically the buyer agents assume this means that it allows the seller to market for BACKUP offers. This is a deadly assumption and one that again….unwinds the binding contract.
It enables the listing agent to take other offers and boot the buyer agent out the door, no matter the time frame or whether you have a “contract” or not.
We cannot practice Law as a Realtor, however, we have in our authority, the ability to know what our Realtor forms mean, and change the language in them.
I suggest we use that ability.
Make sure you and/or your agent knows this practice, as it can cost you a house. Literally.
New Listing: 670 West Road Waterboro, ME
Lovely Country Cape with In Law apartment for extra income or relative! Beautiful landscaping, greenhouse, 3 outbuildings on 5 serene wooded acres!Walk out basement can be finished. Peaceful, easy Maine living!
$249,000 Priced to sell
New Prices on 2 great Maine short sale Listings
338 Rocky Dundee Rd Buxton
$239,000!!! 3 acres of pure country Maine just outside Gorham!
79 Payeur Circle Sanford, Maine $249,000
(wow!!! 4500 sq feet, great neighborhood, down street from Sanford Country Club)





